House panel: Shut prison in Detroit

The Legislature moved forward on the state budget Tuesday, with the Senate approving a plan to limit welfare to 48 months and the House Appropriations Committee deciding to close Detroit’s Mound Road prison. April 27, 2011 – The Detroit News

House votes for dramatic increase in taxes on low-income families

April 28, 2011
Contact: Dave Waymire at (517) 485-6600

Today’s vote by the House of Representatives to dramatically reduce a crucial tax credit for working poor families in Michigan would result in thousands more children in poverty  and contradicts Gov. Rick Snyder’s stated goals of reducing child poverty and increasing young children’s readiness for school. (more…)

Don’t punish the poor who are playing by the rules

A package of proposals under consideration by the Michigan House of Representatives would make it more difficult for people to receive cash assistance when they need it, and would result in more than 12,000 needy families losing their assistance.

The tightening of the 48-month limit has received considerable attention, but there are some lesser-known proposals that are also cause for concern.

One proposal being considered by the Families, Children and Seniors Committee would result in some families being punished for noncompliance with work requirements, even if the noncompliance occurred for good reason or was beyond the family’s control.

Under current law, if a family receiving cash assistance does not meet its work requirements, it gets sanctioned. It is barred from receiving assistance three months for the first instance, three months for the second, and 12 months for the third. The proposal would sanction the family six months for the second instance, and for the third instance the recipient would be barred from assistance for life.

Readers may be thinking “no problem.” After all, we all need to follow rules or expect consequences, right?
The problem is that there might be a good reason why a recipient misses work, leaves a job, reduces hours at a job, or turns down an offer for increased hours—all of which are considered to be instances of noncompliance.

Currently, a recipient who receives notice of a sanction for one of these instances has the right to schedule a meeting with the caseworker within 10 business days to explain the noncompliance and to prove that there was good cause. If the recipient requests the meeting, the sanction cannot be applied until after the meeting has taken place and the caseworker judges that there was not good cause for the noncompliance. This proposal takes away the right to have that meeting.

The Department of Human Services has said the change is necessary because caseworkers are so overloaded that they don’t have time for the meetings, causing a lot of sanctions to be put on hold. The proposal would still allow the recipient to call to contest the sanction. Getting through isn’t easy though because caseworkers often have more than 1,000 cases and their lines are often busy.

The problem is obvious: Caseworkers have far too many cases to be able to give each case the attention that it needs. The solution is not to take away the right of recourse for families that are notified of a pending sanction. The solution is to hire more caseworkers, and the Legislature ought to be focused on making that possible.

None of us want people to receive cash assistance if they are able but unwilling to work. But do we really want to take it away from those who want to work but find themselves unable to do so through no fault of their own?

Members of the House Standing Committee on Families, Children and Seniors need to hear from you on this. Please call them and ask them to oppose these changes contained in the substitutes for House Bills 44094410.

House Standing Committee on Families, Children and Seniors:

— Peter Ruark

Interview with WILS’ Tony Conley

Gilda Z. Jacobs, president and CEO of Michigan League for Human Services. April 20, 2011 — WILS 

Michigan’s budget outlook brightens

A spike in March income tax collections, lower-than-expected tax refund payouts and a generally improving revenue picture mean Gov. Rick Snyder and the Legislature may have as much as $500 million extra to work with in finalizing the state budget for 2012. April 23, 2011 — The Detroit News

Growing state revival could ease budget cuts

Two themes have dominated political discourse in Michigan for what seems like forever: The economy is going down and state government has fewer and fewer dollars to buy goods and services. April 21, 2011 — The Center for Michigan

Online commentary: Taking the shirts off kids’ backs

Let’s be clear about what the budget proposals in Lansing really mean for Michigan citizens: The plan by Gov. Rick Snyder and legislative leaders offers an 86% cut in business taxes at the expense of people who can least afford to sacrifice. April 21, 2011 — Detroit Free Press

Instead of tax credit for 13,000 Jackson County families, lower-income children would receive $25 from state

Thousands of Jackson County’s working poor could get a smaller refund than before if the state decides to preserve a small portion of a tax credit. April 21, 2011 — mlive.com

Governor’s Office Proposes $25 Tax Credit Per Child For Poor Families

Governor Rick Snyder’s administration would like to offer low-income families an annual tax credit worth 25 dollars per child. The credit would be for working-poor families who would lose the state’s Earned Income Tax Credit under Snyder’s budget plan. April 20, 2011 — Interlochen Public Radio

Low-income workers could get $25-per-child credit

A proposal to make up some of the money low-income workers would lose if Michigan’s Earned Income Tax Credit is eliminated isn’t getting many cheers from groups who say the credit should be saved.  April 20, 2011 — Forbes.com

Next Page »